More Evidence-Based Design Guidelines
There’s Evidence-based Design, and then there’s NOT Evidence-based Design.
Here are more evidence-based design art guidelines. Many of these guidelines come from “A Guide to Evidence-based Art” from The Center For Health Design, research by Ulrich and Gilpin, a case study on best practices in evidence-based design by the Mays Clinic at the MD Anderson Cancer Center, and so much more.
Waterscapes
They can be regional, generic, or seasonal. They should be calm and non-turbulent. Dramatic seascapes should be avoided, and flowing or trickling water might negatively impact full or non-functioning bladders.
Landscapes
They can be regional, generic, or seasonal. They should have visual depth or open foreground. Trees should have a broad canopy. Savannah and park-like landscapes are preferred by many. Vegetation should be lush. Empty park benches and sunsets should be avoided. The empty park bench might remind someone of loss and loneliness. A sunset might represent the end of life.
Figurative Art
Figurative art should be observational rather than interpersonal. This art should show smiling or emotionally positive faces. Figures can be diverse and appear in relaxed natural surroundings. However, figures that are too relaxed might negatively impact positive outcomes, especially for people with low motivation or in need of physical therapy.
Wildlife
Any wildlife imagery should be of animals widely considered non-threatening. Close-ups of large mammals looking directly at viewers should be avoided.
Still-life
Still-life can be used sparingly for variety.
Early in my evidence-based design career, I decided NOT to do Still-Life. I dislike drawing or painting Realism, especially as they did in the Middle Ages. I enjoy Impressionism and Expressionism, but I am an Abstract artist at heart. I have relatives who are super masterful at capturing hyper-realism. I greatly appreciate them and what they do, but it’s not anything I am interested in creating.
My studio is in Northern Michigan, and as much as I love all the wildlife, I prefer not to paint them. To capture their amazing beauty, I’ll leave that to my many local artist and photographer friends.
Figurative Art is another category I choose not to do. When I was a teen, people were often amazed at my ability to capture a person’s likeness with a Number 2 pencil. Again, it’s not something I am artistically interested in.
As an evidence-based design artist, I specialize in Waterscapes, Floralscapes (which AI says is a real word), and Landscapes. I like to go deep inside these categories and create art that strategically triggers the brain for health and happiness in others.
Mysteries In The Morning by Dorothea Sandra, EDAC 36”x36”
At first glance of this painting, it may seem as if there isn’t much deep strategy involved, but there is.
If you look at the sky, it’s a pretty blue, and it doesn’t shout or make too much of an impact on the brain. The sun and horizon are bright and cheerful, but their edges are soft and gentle. The evidence-based design purpose is to establish beauty without much impact and with no trauma. My goal was not to overwhelm the brain with too much beauty. The brain should register this area of the canvas as beautiful but mostly safe.
Photo of Lake Huron, one of the world’s largest lakes
Based on medical and scientific studies, hospital/medical facility patients also highly regard familiar nature scenes.
As our eyes see the water in the painting, there is a gradation of color. Very typical of Lake Huron (a familiar nature location for people in this area), the water remains mostly calm and non-turbulent.
I got trained to paint along New England's rocky, violent shores. Dramatic seascapes, which must be avoided in evidence-based design, are what I learned.
It was difficult, especially for my ego, but I chose to keep the water almost flat. I decided to use color (darker to lighter to almost aqua, much like Lake Huron) and brush movement to create water that is enjoyable to view but also calm and non-turbulent.
To create impact, I almost always choose abundant flowers (lush vegetation). Flowers almost always register in the brain as beautiful, representative of love, and safe. By de-emphasizing the sky and water (two areas of safety or potentially profound danger) and emphasizing the flowers (with little to no history of causing harm to humans), the overall composition helps to create feelings of well-being and happiness.
When I paint, my evidence-based design goal is not to create overwhelming beauty. This is what I was taught an artist should do. When I create evidence-based design compositions, my goal is to create art that triggers the brain to create dopamine (happiness chemicals).
Sometimes, I will add a little drama to the sky, as with this cloud below, which often appears like this over Lake Huron in the morning. Even though the cloud is loud, the colors are still soft and happy and the horizon line gently blends into the waveless water. The flowers, on the other hand, pop with color and a diversity of shapes of Impressionism.
Mackinac Memories by Dorothea Sandra, EDAC. Sold in 2025 to a collector in Fort Worth, Texas.
What Is The Definition Of Evidence-Based Design?
There are broad and specific definitions of evidence-based design.
Here is the definition from the National Library of Medicine:
“Evidence-based design is scientific analysis methodology that emphasizes the use of data acquired in order to influence the design process in hospitals. It measures the physical and psychological effects of the built environment on its users.” (National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health)
Even Wikipedia now has a definition:
“Evidence-based design (EBD) is the process of constructing a building or physical environment based on scientific research to achieve the best possible outcomes.” (Wikipedia)
The definition I like best is from The Center For Health Design.
“…the process of basing decisions about the built environment on credible research to achieve the best possible outcomes.” (www.healthdesign.org/edac)
The built environment (people-built surroundings where human activity occurs) includes art, and since my EDAC (evidence-based design) training and certification, I have sold hundreds of paintings based on these definitions.
Some of my first Great Lakes/Lakeside Lovelies paintings using Evidence-Based Design training.
Based on medical and scientific studies, hospital/medical facility patients highly regard familiar nature scenes.
When I first started creating art using evidence-based design, my first creations were what I called Lakeside Lovelies and Great Lakes Lovelies (above). They were familiar nature scenes, mainly along Highway 23 in Northern Michigan. Half of my inspiration came from Lake Huron and the Straits of Mackinac. The air in this area is clear and clean, so my eyes can almost always catch super-crisp images.
The other half of my inspiration came from the abundance and variety of flowers around town, the Upper Penisula and Northern counties, and within my own art studio’s yard. Who would have thought it? Here is a bush—and of all places—next to my garage that inspired many of my paintings. In this area, this bush is a plentiful sight in the Spring, which also makes its stems a familiar nature scene.
Credible research told me that local natural landscapes helped to achieve the best possible health outcomes, and I strongly dislike painting realism (which isn’t a requirement in evidence-based design), so I happily went with a floral contemporary Impressionism style. (Thank you, Monsieur Monet.)
At the beginning of my journey as an evidence-based design artist and having a studio in Northern Michigan (where a few people still have trophy deer heads and bear skins on their living room walls), I decided to have a little fun and help promote art in the area with the new evidence-based design paintings and videos. Here’s an older video. Enjoy!